Nick Griffin

I Disagree with this man completely and like a fairly large amount of British citizens I am not completely British, or what ever he classifies it. Honestly I find him absurd and a complete ignorant idiot. Usually I would feel the need to back myself up but today I don't and it is not the point I want to make. Everything that has been said about him has been said, I know what I think about him and what he stands for and I don't feel the need to voices it any more than anyone else. I don't understand anyone that would vote for him but please if you would explain to me why, i would also like to invite you to look thought friends and think how nay of them come under the bubble of indigenous to the British isles, then re-read the BNP policy and past policy's.

Firstly I have only just watched question time. I was busy when it first aired and did not get a chance to view it till now. So I have read the fall out before I saw the cause, I have seen the reaction to an event that I had not seen. So instead of watching it with a closed mind and complete hatred of Nick Griffin I sat down and watched on I player (brilliant thing by the way, watching TV on-line) and think the BBC appear to handled this poorly and not just poorly, incredibly poorly. You may have noticed though out the programme there was uproar if clapping to anyone that attacked, yes I am going to use that, attacked Mr Griffin. Now watch the last few minutes the last quarter and you notice and less negative responses. People and begin to simplified although i am glad to not too a huge amount.

He does have a right to stage his views as i have my right to stage my views about him and who ever reads this has there right to stage there views on what i have written. The thing that is annoying me the most is that fact that Nick Griffin has been on the BBC before serial times, on political and relevant programmes and has again expressed view that most British people disagree with. The main reason that no one reacted was because the media did not report on it, and then the media whips up a frenzy on question time and i fail to see the difference between that and newsnight or andrew marr.

If Griffin had been ignored and just left to say what he feels the need to say with out the "lynch mob" and media uproar, i would think the events would go past with little impact but now he has been given a stage to sympathetic ears. People with more right wings views and maybe a little more open to him. In this climate when Labours chances are minimal and trust for the torries isn't as high as you might think the BNP seats increase and that is what scares me. I would like to me a plea to you know please vote, let the government know what you want or those who vote BNP might get there way.

Unlikely though.

Don't try to manipulate me

Technically the broadcasters are not allowed to report the news with a point of view. you will see if they have interviews, on most subjects they will have both sides of the argument present. newspapers are however allowed to to twist and contort things, the papers called the red tops are partially blunt and obvious about it, the more intellectual papers are a tab more subtle but you still notice it. but I don't mind that I know what they are doing I can see what they are doing and am prepared and ready to question whatever I read as merely an opinion.

What I do object to is the way Television tries it. I can see what they are doing and most of time it really annoys me, but what worries me is the times I don't notice it. I would like to know how much I have been brain washed by the media's point of view, still I quiet often yell at the news I am guessing not so much but it worries me.

For example the way the got Tony Blair out I know it was a combination of the two media's but the television had a lot more influence on that than you would. I know it is just theory I can not give you any proof of the top of my head but watch the news and see it for Gordon brown this time round. David Cameron is being shown in a very good light in comparison even though the Torrie are refusing to tell us exactly what there policy are they are being presented as the next party to take power in Westminster.

I would like to use this to reflect on how the media does control the masses, I would love to sit here and say I rebel against it but I honestly have no clue if I am or not but if conservatives get in I feel they have had a clear hand from the media playing up policy that they have presented rather than question how well the work.

Any way just another opinionated rant, i thought i would have a little change for my next blog but we'll see when that happens.

I do go on

I don’t understand everyone’s problem with immigrates. Even in this economic slump, I really don’t understand why people will shout abuse and tell people to get out of their country. How exactly is it yours? I know I have pretty much no pride in where I come from but I take pride in those I have come from and my family roots. I don’t see certain places as mine personally. I do however find places important and memorable but it is due to them having important and memorable people, enjoyable places or just a memory that put a smile on my face. Just so that is clear it isn’t that I have no connection to anywhere it is more, why not have connections everywhere? Why not leave a bit of you everywhere and somewhere.

I like that idea. How would you go about that legally? I don’t mean some message book in every City; no one looks back in them not really. I want my presents to be seen on a big wall, legally preferably. What if you had your photo taken at each airport and each airport had a wall that they put that picture up. Imagine if you where in an airport waiting for a plane and you looked at this wall and saw someone’s face that you know. Would you stand there and think “small world,” which is part of the point I am trying to make and I will get there soon.

So in having a few places here and there that to me have important links to my past, present or future, doesn’t mean that I would have any problem with someone from some far off place becoming part of that world.

As a young woman who wishes to live aboard for a short amount of time. I would like to know if the same people that have a problem with those who come here looking for work, an escape or just a new start have a problem with me going to someone else’s country and taking someone else’s job and money. I want to know if that same person who says that they should all be kicked out would mine me going to their country and living there for a while, or if they might get that I just want to experience the world.

I know I might be going for different reasons but really how hard is it to share. I know there are only so many jobs, room, food, water and energy but why must we place such strong controls over our border, after all it is only a small world and sometimes one corner of that world is hideous and evil. Why can’t we just let them out? It is so hard to share? It is so easy to be selfish in today’s climate, but I wish people would remember how lucky we are as a country. I wish people could see how our world might be a bit brilliant if you let in cultures you don’t know and you embrace it rather than reject change.

But hey we don’t like change.

I however seem to wish to live in a utopia, which is not always a bad thing.